Skip to main content
Official Logo of Columbia Business School
Academics
  • Visit Academics
  • Degree Programs
  • Admissions
  • Tuition & Financial Aid
  • Campus Life
  • Career Management
Faculty & Research
  • Visit Faculty & Research
  • Academic Divisions
  • Search the Directory
  • Research
  • Faculty Resources
  • Teaching Excellence
Executive Education
  • Visit Executive Education
  • For Organizations
  • For Individuals
  • Program Finder
  • Online Programs
  • Certificates
About Us
  • Visit About Us
  • CBS Directory
  • Events Calendar
  • Leadership
  • Our History
  • The CBS Experience
  • Newsroom
Alumni
  • Visit Alumni
  • Update Your Information
  • Lifetime Network
  • Alumni Benefits
  • Alumni Career Management
  • Women's Circle
  • Alumni Clubs
Insights
  • Visit Insights
  • Digital Future
  • Climate
  • Business & Society
  • Entrepreneurship
  • 21st Century Finance
  • Magazine
Insights
  • Digital Future
  • Climate
  • Business & Society
  • Entrepreneurship
  • 21st Century Finance
  • Magazine
  • More 

Has Davos Man Changed?

Nobel Laureate Joseph E. Stiglitz asks whether “Davos man” — rich, and powerful, perhaps out of touch, but representative of the global elite — has become more enlightened.

Published
January 30, 2020
Publication
Business & Society
Jump to main content
Article Author(s)
Joseph Stiglitz

Joseph Stiglitz

Professor
Economics Division
Professor
Heilbrunn Center for Graham and Dodd Investing
Executive Director and Co-founder
Initiative for Policy Dialogue
Joseph E. Stiglitz
Category
Thought Leadership
Topic(s)
Climate and Policy, Economics and Policy, Leadership and Strategy, World Business

About the Researcher(s)

Joseph Stiglitz

Joseph Stiglitz

Professor
Economics Division
Professor
Heilbrunn Center for Graham and Dodd Investing
Executive Director and Co-founder
Initiative for Policy Dialogue

0%

This year marked the 50th anniversary of the World Economic Forum's flagship meeting of the world's business and political elites in Davos, Switzerland. Much has changed since my first Davos in 1995. Back then, there was euphoria over globalization, hope for ex-communist countries' transition to the market, and confidence that new technologies would open up new vistas from which all would benefit. Businesses, working with government, would lead the way.

Today, with the world facing climate, environmental, and inequality crises, the mood is very different. Facebook, willing to provide a platform for mis-/disinformation and political manipulation, regardless of the consequences for democracy, has shown the dangers of a privately controlled monopolistic surveillance economy. Corporate leaders, and not just in the financial sector, have displayed remarkable moral turpitude.

Moreover, multilateralism is under attack. Its strongest defender historically, the United States, now has an administration committed to “America First,” and to undermining global cooperation, even as the need for cooperation in a host of areas — including peace, health, and the environment — becomes increasingly apparent.

This year's meeting highlighted disenchantment with the increasingly dominant American model of shareholder-first, profit-maximizing firms. More than 50 years ago, WEF founder and head Klaus Schwab argued for stakeholder capitalism: enterprises should be accountable for the interests of their customers, workers, communities, and the environment, as well as their shareholders. Some 45 years ago, with Sandy Grossman, I showed in a standard economic framework that maximizing shareholder value would not maximize societal welfare. In speech after speech this year, business leaders and academics explained how Milton Friedman's successful advocacy of shareholder capitalism led directly to the crises we face today — including, in the US, opioid addiction, childhood diabetes, declining life expectancy amid soaring “deaths of despair” — and the political divisions they have fueled.

To be sure, recognition that there is a problem is necessary if we are to change course. But we also have to understand that the causes of societal maladies go beyond maximizing shareholder value. At the root of the problem is neoliberalism's excessive faith in markets and skepticism of government, which underpins a policy agenda focused on deregulation and tax cuts. After a 40-year experiment, we can declare it a failure. Growth has been lower, and most of the gains went to the top. While this should be obvious, there is no consensus among our business leaders.

Even though the applause for US President Donald Trump, who delivered one of the opening addresses, was the most anemic I have seen for a global leader, almost no one openly criticized him. Perhaps audience members feared a critical tweet or felt gratitude for a tax cut that benefited billionaires and large corporations at the expense of nearly everyone else (indeed, tax rates in the US will rise for some 70% of those in the middle).

Cognitive dissonance — or dishonesty — was on full display. Attendees could highlight the importance of climate change and tout their corporations' response to it, and yet welcome Trump's deregulation, which will allow the US, already the leader in per capita greenhouse-gas emissions, to pollute even more. 

Moreover, despite much talk about stakeholder capitalism, there was no discussion of reducing CEO and managerial pay to ameliorate growing pay disparities, or of the first element of corporate social responsibility: paying your fair share of taxes by curbing multinational tax avoidance, and ensuring that developing countries get a fair share of tax revenues. This led Rob Cox, global editor of Reuters Breakingviews, to suggest that stakeholder capitalism might be a strategy to unfetter CEOs even more: If they fail to meet profit goals, they could waffle and say they were meeting broader environmental, social, and governance objectives.

Nor were reforms that might increase workers' bargaining power, through the strengthening of unions and collective bargaining, at the center of the discussion, even though in Europe such reforms are at the top of the new European Commission's agenda. To their credit, a few US firms, such as PayPal, explained their commitment to paying livable wages, going well beyond the minimum wage mandated by law.

And yet some of the business leaders at Davos this year, especially those from Europe, seemed to have grasped the urgency of responding to climate change and the scope of what is needed. And some have actually taken giant strides. There might still be some “greenwashing” — banks that talk about energy-efficient light bulbs as they lend money to coal-fired power plants — but the tide has turned.

A few business leaders also recognized that our economic and social maladies will not cure themselves — that even if most businesses were socially motivated, a single-minded focus on profits entails a race to the bottom. A soft-drink company that doesn't want to produce addictive sugar-rich drinks that can contribute to childhood diabetes risks losing out to a less scrupulous enterprise.

In short, unfettered capitalism has played a central role in creating the multiple crises confronting our societies today. If capitalism is to work — if it is to address these crises and serve society — it can't do so in its current form. There must be a new kind of capitalism – what I have elsewhere called progressive capitalism, entailing a better balance of government, markets, and civil society.

The discussion at Davos this year may be part of a move in the right direction, but if leaders truly mean what they say, we need to see some proof: corporations paying taxes and livable wages, for a start, and respecting — and even advocating — government regulations to protect our health, safety, workers, and the environment.

Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics, is a Chazen Institute Advisor, University Professor at Columbia University, and Chief Economist at the Roosevelt Institute. He is the author, most recently, of “People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”

 

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2020.

About the Researcher(s)

Joseph Stiglitz

Joseph Stiglitz

Professor
Economics Division
Professor
Heilbrunn Center for Graham and Dodd Investing
Executive Director and Co-founder
Initiative for Policy Dialogue

You Might Like

Business and Society, Diversity, Ethics and Leadership, Globalization, Leadership, Leadership and Strategy, Management, Social Impact
Date
February 04, 2025
A protestor holding a placard
Business and Society, Diversity, Ethics and Leadership, Globalization, Leadership, Leadership and Strategy, Management, Social Impact

When Should Companies Take a Stand? The Risks and Rewards of Corporate Activism

New CBS research explores the factors driving inconsistent corporate stances on global sociopolitical issues and the risks that come with them.
  • Read more about When Should Companies Take a Stand? The Risks and Rewards of Corporate Activism about When Should Companies Take a Stand? The Risks and Rewards of Corporate Activism
Business and Society, Leadership
Type
Business & Society
Date
January 23, 2025
Business and Society, Leadership

The Wall and the Bridge with Glenn Hubbard

Taking Adam Smith’s logic to Youngstown, Ohio, as a case study in economic disruption, Hubbard discusses the benefits of an open economy and creating bridges to support people in turbulent times so that they remain engaged and prepared to participate in, and reap the rewards of, a new economic landscape.
  • Read more about The Wall and the Bridge with Glenn Hubbard about The Wall and the Bridge with Glenn Hubbard
Elections, Marketing, Politics
Type
Business & Society
Date
October 10, 2024
Elections, Marketing, Politics

The Rise of Meddle Ads in Political Campaigns—and Why They’re Backfiring

Watch Professor Mohamed Hussein describe this new approach to political campaigning and explain why it might not always have the desired impact.
  • Read more about The Rise of Meddle Ads in Political Campaigns—and Why They’re Backfiring about The Rise of Meddle Ads in Political Campaigns—and Why They’re Backfiring
Business and Society, Labor, Leadership
Date
September 05, 2024
CBS Photo Image
Business and Society, Labor, Leadership

The Power of New Hires: How Fresh Talent Shapes Company Culture

A company's culture can significantly impact its financial performance, employee retention, and the overall well-being of its employees, according to new research from Professor Wei Cai.
  • Read more about The Power of New Hires: How Fresh Talent Shapes Company Culture about The Power of New Hires: How Fresh Talent Shapes Company Culture
Save Article

Download PDF

More to Explore
Share
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Threads
  • Share on LinkedIn

External CSS

Homepage Breadcrumb Block

Official Logo of Columbia Business School

Columbia University in the City of New York
665 West 130th Street, New York, NY 10027
Tel. 212-854-1100

Maps and Directions
    • Centers & Programs
    • Current Students
    • Corporate
    • Directory
    • Support Us
    • Recruiters & Partners
    • Faculty & Staff
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Accessibility
    • Privacy & Policy Statements
Back to Top Upward arrow
TOP

© Columbia University

  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn