Skip to main content
Official Logo of Columbia Business School
Academics
  • Visit Academics
  • Degree Programs
  • Admissions
  • Tuition & Financial Aid
  • Campus Life
  • Career Management
Faculty & Research
  • Visit Faculty & Research
  • Academic Divisions
  • Search the Directory
  • Research
  • Faculty Resources
  • Teaching Excellence
Executive Education
  • Visit Executive Education
  • For Organizations
  • For Individuals
  • Program Finder
  • Online Programs
  • Certificates
About Us
  • Visit About Us
  • CBS Directory
  • Events Calendar
  • Leadership
  • Our History
  • The CBS Experience
  • Newsroom
Alumni
  • Visit Alumni
  • Update Your Information
  • Lifetime Network
  • Alumni Benefits
  • Alumni Career Management
  • Women's Circle
  • Alumni Clubs
Insights
  • Visit Insights
  • Digital Future
  • Climate
  • Business & Society
  • Entrepreneurship
  • 21st Century Finance
  • Magazine
Insights
  • Digital Future
  • Climate
  • Business & Society
  • Entrepreneurship
  • 21st Century Finance
  • Magazine
  • More 

The Race to Innovate

What happens when a country relies on homegrown products and ideas rather than using the world's best? New research reveals surprising answers.

Published
May 16, 2021
Publication
Business & Society
Jump to main content
Article Author(s)

Chazen Global Insights

Affiliated Author
Innovation Image
Category
Thought Leadership
Topic(s)
Business and Society

0%

It used to be that China and the United States shared intellectual property for mutual benefit (yes, really!). But more recently, growing mistrust between the two countries has led to policies — everything from trade tariffs to stronger IP protections — that discourage knowledge sharing. How has this shift to protectionism affected marketplace competition? And at what cost to Chinese and American companies?

In “Mapping US-China Technology Decoupling, Innovation and Firm Performance,” Chazen Senior Scholar Wei Jiang and colleagues from Peking University's Guanghua School of Management and Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business evaluate technology decoupling—that is, reducing or ridding its product development of dependence on outside components and concepts — between the two countries over the first two decades of the 21st century. What the data show is that China has benefited from its integration with the developed world, especially the US, and decoupling has created a barrier to innovation for Chinese companies.

Research

This is the first empirical study to assess the degree of US-China technology decoupling over time. Researchers analyzed data from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), and quantified the levels of technology decoupling between the two countries by measuring the propensity for a domestic patent to cite a foreign patent versus citing another domestic patent. For example, patents filed in one country in a technology class that never cited patents in the other country would suggest two completely decoupled or separate ecosystems of innovation. Conversely, a completely integrated systems would mean patents in either country cite patents in the other at the same rate they cite domestic patents.

Researchers then examined the economic outcomes at the industry level and at the firm level from 2000-2019.

Results

The research reveals that growing integration — not decoupling — has been the defining characteristic of US-China technological competition in the 21st century. Indeed, it is this level of integration that has ignited China's emergence as a global technological power. And while the US maintains an overall advantage in innovation, based on the share of global R&D, China is closing the gap in both R&D expenditures and patenting activities, particularly when it comes to drones and AI technologies.

The analysis shows that China has relied heavily on adopting cutting-edge technologies, especially those developed by the US. This technological dependence with the US peaked in 2008. After that, China was able to build stronger domestic technological capability and decrease its dependence on the US — in other words, increasing the level of decoupling.

But such decoupling comes with a cost to Chinese companies. The research finds that a more decoupled system creates a barrier for further learning and knowledge development, hindering Chinese companies' ability to innovate at the pace of their American counterparts. In order to remain competitive, Chinese companies need access to foreign technology.

In addition, the analysis indicates that increased US-China technology decoupling is followed by higher patent outputs for both US and Chinese companies. However, firm efficiency and valuation suffer in China, suggesting a cost for “reinventing the wheel” in a decoupled world. Decoupling has not inflicted any damages on the productivity and valuation of US companies, on the other hand, presumably because they maintain a competitive edge in most fields.

Key Takeaways

 

 

  • China's technological progress has benefited tremendously from its integration with developed countries, most notably the US.
  • Higher levels of decoupling are followed by periods of Chinese dependence on their American counterparts, suggesting a reliance on foreign innovation to stay on pace with global advancements.
  • Decoupling has adversely affected firm efficiency and valuation in China, but has not inflicted any damages on US companies to date.
  • While the US maintains a technological edge, China is closing the gap in both R&D expenditures and patenting activities.

You Might Like

Business and Society, Diversity, Ethics and Leadership, Globalization, Leadership, Leadership and Strategy, Management, Social Impact
Date
February 04, 2025
A protestor holding a placard
Business and Society, Diversity, Ethics and Leadership, Globalization, Leadership, Leadership and Strategy, Management, Social Impact

When Should Companies Take a Stand? The Risks and Rewards of Corporate Activism

New CBS research explores the factors driving inconsistent corporate stances on global sociopolitical issues and the risks that come with them.
  • Read more about When Should Companies Take a Stand? The Risks and Rewards of Corporate Activism about When Should Companies Take a Stand? The Risks and Rewards of Corporate Activism
Business and Society, Leadership
Type
Business & Society
Date
January 23, 2025
Business and Society, Leadership

The Wall and the Bridge with Glenn Hubbard

Taking Adam Smith’s logic to Youngstown, Ohio, as a case study in economic disruption, Hubbard discusses the benefits of an open economy and creating bridges to support people in turbulent times so that they remain engaged and prepared to participate in, and reap the rewards of, a new economic landscape.
  • Read more about The Wall and the Bridge with Glenn Hubbard about The Wall and the Bridge with Glenn Hubbard
Elections, Marketing, Politics
Type
Business & Society
Date
October 10, 2024
Elections, Marketing, Politics

The Rise of Meddle Ads in Political Campaigns—and Why They’re Backfiring

Watch Professor Mohamed Hussein describe this new approach to political campaigning and explain why it might not always have the desired impact.
  • Read more about The Rise of Meddle Ads in Political Campaigns—and Why They’re Backfiring about The Rise of Meddle Ads in Political Campaigns—and Why They’re Backfiring
Business and Society, Labor, Leadership
Date
September 05, 2024
CBS Photo Image
Business and Society, Labor, Leadership

The Power of New Hires: How Fresh Talent Shapes Company Culture

A company's culture can significantly impact its financial performance, employee retention, and the overall well-being of its employees, according to new research from Professor Wei Cai.
  • Read more about The Power of New Hires: How Fresh Talent Shapes Company Culture about The Power of New Hires: How Fresh Talent Shapes Company Culture
Save Article

Download PDF

More to Explore
Share
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Threads
  • Share on LinkedIn

External CSS

Homepage Breadcrumb Block

Official Logo of Columbia Business School

Columbia University in the City of New York
665 West 130th Street, New York, NY 10027
Tel. 212-854-1100

Maps and Directions
    • Centers & Programs
    • Current Students
    • Corporate
    • Directory
    • Support Us
    • Recruiters & Partners
    • Faculty & Staff
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Accessibility
    • Privacy & Policy Statements
Back to Top Upward arrow
TOP

© Columbia University

  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn