Skip to main content
Official Logo of Columbia Business School
Academics
  • Visit Academics
  • Degree Programs
  • Admissions
  • Tuition & Financial Aid
  • Campus Life
  • Career Management
Faculty & Research
  • Visit Faculty & Research
  • Academic Divisions
  • Search the Directory
  • Research
  • Faculty Resources
  • Teaching Excellence
Executive Education
  • Visit Executive Education
  • For Organizations
  • For Individuals
  • Program Finder
  • Online Programs
  • Certificates
About Us
  • Visit About Us
  • CBS Directory
  • Events Calendar
  • Leadership
  • Our History
  • The CBS Experience
  • Newsroom
Alumni
  • Visit Alumni
  • Update Your Information
  • Lifetime Network
  • Alumni Benefits
  • Alumni Career Management
  • Women's Circle
  • Alumni Clubs
Insights
  • Visit Insights
  • Digital Future
  • Climate
  • Business & Society
  • Entrepreneurship
  • 21st Century Finance
  • Magazine

A Unique Role: How Brands Can Transcend Polarization

Recently, some brands have chosen to take sides on controversial issues. However, this type of brand activism may aggravate social polarization without benefit. New research affiliated with the Bernstein Center for Leadership and Ethics at Columbia Business School suggests brands that choose a different path can play a unique and successful role decreasing the polarization of social and political attitudes.

Published
September 20, 2024
Publication
Bernstein Center for Leadership and Ethics
Jump to main content
Article Author(s)

Sonia Kim '23

Affiliated Author
Category
Thought Leadership
Topic(s)
Business and Society, Leadership, Research

About the Researcher(s)

Gita Johar

Gita Johar

Meyer Feldberg Professor of Business
Marketing Division

0%

Leadership Implications

  • Similar brand preferences increase people’s willingness to discuss divisive social issues.
  • With brand preference serving as a common denominator, brand communities offer a positive safe space for dialogue by deescalating demographic differences and increasing an appreciation for a difference in opinions.
  • Brands could be a vehicle to help reduce social polarization if they foster difficult conversations among loyal consumers.

In “The Power of Brands: Similarity in Brand Preferences Increases Willingness to Discuss Controversial Issues,” CBS PhD candidate and Bernstein Research Grant recipient Sonia Kim investigates people’s willingness to discuss controversial topics with others who share their brand preferences. She and her collaborator, CBS professor Gita Johar, find that when people believe potential conversation partners share their brand preferences, they are more willing to engage in a dialogue and that those discussions are more impactful.

Testing Conversational Attitudes

The researchers conducted a series of eight studies to test the effects of brand preference similarity on people’s willingness to discuss controversial issues. The first study confirmed the theory that people assume others who share their same brand preferences also share similar personal values, such as an interest in healthy living or environmentalism — even when the brands involved were not inherently activist or political. Then, because previous research showed that anticipated disagreement is one of the biggest barriers to initiating controversial conversations, the researchers tested whether people were more willing to discuss a divisive topic (in this instance, raising the minimum wage) when they were informed that the discussion partner shared the preference for a favorite car brand. The results showed they were significantly more willing.

Brand preference is a stronger driver than demographics when it comes to creating a willingness to discuss controversial issues.

Importantly, the researchers found that liking the same brand is particularly effective in fostering conversations among people from dissimilar demographic backgrounds. While people are generally willing to discuss even sensitive topics with others from similar demographic backgrounds, they avoid initiating conversations with people from different demographic groups altogether. In one study, the researchers revealed that people can overcome this reluctance if they learn that the potential conversation partners prefer the same brands as them. (See graph).

Graph showing willingness to discuss a social issue

 

Next, the researchers investigated whether brand preferences could help overcome differences in opinion. They showed that even when people learned their potential discussion partners held different positions than their own on a topic, they were still more willing to talk about it with people who shared their brand preferences. Plus, once people participated in the conversations, they were much more willing to find common ground. Surveying participants before and after discussions showed that even very short conversations decreased opinion differences (in this case, about phasing out gasoline-powered cars) and opinions converged even more when participants believed their discussion partners shared brand preferences.

In a final study, the researchers analyzed brand and non-brand communities on Reddit. They found that brand-associated forums have a generally more positive and receptive conversational tone, expressing more positive emotions and less negative emotions, anxiety, and anger.

Conclusions

Statistics suggest that people from different demographic backgrounds tend to have opposing opinions on social issues. Previous research also shows this disagreement worsens when people choose to interact only within their demographic bubble. This new research finds that brand preference is a stronger driver than demographics when it comes to creating a willingness to discuss controversial issues.

Society needs solutions that create opportunities for people from distinctive backgrounds to interact, and this research suggests brands are uniquely positioned to help create positive and welcoming spaces for dialogue. By convening healthy conversations and debates among their fans, brands could help reduce the increasing polarization in society today and foster a shared appreciation of how similarities and differences of opinion can co-exist in communities.

 

Explore more Bernstein-sponsored research that highlights real-world applications for leaders.

About the Researcher(s)

Gita Johar

Gita Johar

Meyer Feldberg Professor of Business
Marketing Division
Save Article

Download PDF

Share
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Threads
  • Share on LinkedIn

External CSS

Official Logo of Columbia Business School

Columbia University in the City of New York
665 West 130th Street, New York, NY 10027
Tel. 212-854-1100

Maps and Directions
    • Centers & Programs
    • Current Students
    • Corporate
    • Directory
    • Support Us
    • Recruiters & Partners
    • Faculty & Staff
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Accessibility
    • Privacy & Policy Statements
Back to Top Upward arrow
TOP

© Columbia University

  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn