Financial Accounting & Auditing

Reprinted in Fred Lane, (ed.), <em>Current Issues in Public Administration</em> (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1978), pp. 288- 301.

This paper is presented within the context of two streams of research which can be identified in the current literature of empirical accounting research. Both of these research areas deal with changes in accounting methods. The first deals with the motivation for changes in accounting methods, and the second area, attempts are made to discover the consequences of accounting changes in terms of the reaction of capital markets to the output of the accounting process.

This paper deals primarily with forecast disclosure rules, a topic that has attracted the attention of both the Securities and Exchange Commission and the accounting profession. We consider two fundamental and related aspects of such a rule: 1) the extent to which the type of information to be disclosed conveys information pertinent to valuing firms; and 2) the extent to which a rule requiring public forecast disclosure is consistent with Pareto optimal allocations of resources.

The purpose of this paper is to discover a theoretically sound model of asset valuation by reference to the basic underlying concept of Financial Position. It will be shown that several models of asset valuation can be developed from alternative assumptions or definitions of Financial Position, but that the application of certain metaphysical constraints brings about the rejection of some of these models.

In this paper, I estimate the magnitude of an informational friction limiting credit reallocation to firms during the 2007 to 2009 financial crisis. Because lenders rely on private information when deciding which relationship to end, borrowers looking for a new lender are adversely selected. I show how to separately identify private information from information common to all lenders but unobservable to the econometrician by using bank shocks within a discrete choice model of relationships.

This monograph reports on developing research that assesses the risk of equity investing from financial statements. The relevant information is conveyed by accounting numbers generated under accounting principles that respond to risk and its resolution, namely the realization principle and conservative accounting for investment. The recognition of this information leads to a financial statement analysis that extracts the risk information, to a reevaluation of performance metrics, and to revisions in risk factor models in asset pricing that utilize accounting information.

Investment funds that claim to focus on socially responsible stocks have proliferated in recent times. In this paper, we verify whether ESG mutual funds actually invest in firms that have stakeholder-friendly track records. Using a comprehensive sample of self-labelled ESG mutual funds (as identified by Morningstar) in the United States from 2010 to 2018, we find that these funds hold portfolio firms with worse track records for compliance with labor and environmental laws, relative to portfolio firms held by non-ESG funds managed by the same financial institutions in the same years.