Skip to main content
Official Logo of Columbia Business School
Academics
  • Visit Academics
  • Degree Programs
  • Admissions
  • Tuition & Financial Aid
  • Campus Life
  • Career Management
Faculty & Research
  • Visit Faculty & Research
  • Academic Divisions
  • Search the Directory
  • Research
  • Faculty Resources
  • Teaching Excellence
Executive Education
  • Visit Executive Education
  • For Organizations
  • For Individuals
  • Program Finder
  • Online Programs
  • Certificates
About Us
  • Visit About Us
  • CBS Directory
  • Events Calendar
  • Leadership
  • Our History
  • The CBS Experience
  • Newsroom
Alumni
  • Visit Alumni
  • Update Your Information
  • Lifetime Network
  • Alumni Benefits
  • Alumni Career Management
  • Women's Circle
  • Alumni Clubs
Insights
  • Visit Insights
  • Digital Future
  • Climate
  • Business & Society
  • Entrepreneurship
  • 21st Century Finance
  • Magazine
CBS Landing Image
Faculty & Research
  • Academic Divisions
  • Search the Faculty
  • Research
  • Faculty Resources
  • News
  • More 

Entrepreneurship & Innovation

See the latest research, articles and faculty on the Entrepreneurship & Innovation Area of Expertise at Columbia Business School.

Jump to main content

Latest on Entrepreneurship & Innovation

No articles have been found by those filters.

Pagination

  • First page 1
  • Ellipsis …
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Current page 10

Entrepreneurship & Innovation Faculty

Entrepreneurship & Innovation Research

Thinking within the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets

Authors
L. Kray, Adam Galinsky, and E. Wong
Date
July 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

By comparing reality to what might have been, counterfactuals promote a relational processing style characterized by a tendency to consider relationships and associations among a set of stimuli. As such, counterfactual mind-sets were expected to improve performance on tasks involving the consideration of relationships and associations but to impair performance on tasks requiring novel ideas that are uninfluenced by salient associations. The authors conducted several experiments to test this hypothesis.

Read More about Thinking within the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets

Starting low but ending high: A reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions

Authors
G. Ku, Adam Galinsky, and J. Murnighan
Date
June 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Counter to the "start high, end high" effect of anchors in individual judgments and dyadic negotiations, 6 studies using a diverse set of methodologies document how and why, in the social setting of auctions, lower starting prices result in higher final prices. Three processes contribute to this effect. First, lower starting prices reduce barriers to entry, which increase traffic and generate higher final prices. Second, lower starting prices entice bidders to invest time and energy (creating sunk costs) and, consequently, escalate their commitments.

Read More about Starting low but ending high: A reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions

Ownership, Incentives, and the Hold-Up Problem

Authors
Tim Baldenius
Date
January 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
The RAND Journal of Economics

Vertical integration is often proposed as a way to resolve hold-up problems, ignoring the empirical fact that division managers tend to maximize divisional (not firmwide) profit when investing. This paper develops a model with asymmetric information at the bargaining stage and investment returns taking the form of cash and "empire benefits." Owners of a vertically integrated firm then will provide division managers with low-powered incentives so as to induce them to bargain "more cooperatively," resulting in higher investments and overall profit as compared with non-integration.

Read More about Ownership, Incentives, and the Hold-Up Problem

Power, optimism, and risk-taking

Authors
Cameron Anderson and Adam Galinsky
Date
January 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
European Journal of Social Psychology

Five studies investigated the hypotheses that the sense of power increases optimism in perceiving risks and leads to more risky behavior. In Studies 1 and 2, individuals with a higher generalized sense of power and those primed with a high-power mind-set were more optimistic in their perceptions of risk. Study 3 primed the concept of power nonconsciously and found that both power and gain/loss frame had independent effects on risk preferences. In Study 4, those primed with a high-power mind-set were more likely to act in a risk-seeking fashion (i.e., engage in unprotected sex).

Read More about Power, optimism, and risk-taking

Overconfident, underprepared: Why you may not be ready to negotiate

Authors
Kristina Diekmann and Adam Galinsky
Date
January 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Negotiation

According to most negotiation experts, thorough preparation is the key to successful bargaining. Identifying your interests, alternatives, walkaway point, and ideal outcome — not to mention your opponent's interests, alternatives, and so on — can help you perform at your best once talks begin. The more you know about yourself and your counterpart, the more control you'll have during the negotiation process.

Read More about Overconfident, underprepared: Why you may not be ready to negotiate

How to defuse threats at the bargaining table

Authors
K. Liljenquist and Adam Galinsky
Date
January 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Negotiation

Sooner or later, every negotiator faces threats at the bargaining table. How should you respond when the other side threatens to walk away, file a lawsuit, or damage your reputation?

Read More about How to defuse threats at the bargaining table

Power plays

Authors
Adam Galinsky and Joe Magee
Date
January 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Negotiation

The article presents information on the role of power in negotiation. Power could generate competition or conflict in negotiations, however, effective channelization of power helps in bringing the win-win situation to both the parties. Social psychologists have described power as lack of dependence on others. Individuals possessing power tend to have the approach related to the behavior that includes positive mood or searching for rewards in their environment. On the other hand, powerless individuals show a great deal of self-inhibition and fear towards potential threats.

Read More about Power plays

Gain less pain: How to negotiate burdens

Authors
H. Sondak and Adam Galinsky
Date
January 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Negotiation

The psychological research is clear: bad events affect us much more powerfully than good events. So it stands to reason that burdens weigh more heavily upon our decision processes than do benefits. Negotiations that center around burdens can pose psychological hazards for negotiators — contentiousness, clouded judgment, suspicion, and a diminished understanding of their own interests. The result? A smaller pie of resources, for one thing. Here is a guide to help you avert the dangers.

Read More about Gain less pain: How to negotiate burdens

The view from the other side of the table

Authors
Adam Galinsky, W. Maddux, and G. Ku
Date
January 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Negotiation

The better able you are to "get inside the head" of your opponent, the better your negotiated outcomes are likely to be. But very few of us are born with the ability to take on the perspective of others effectively. Fortunately, this skill can be learned. The authors of this article show you how to use perspective taking — the active consideration and appreciation of another person's viewpoint, role, and underlying motivations — to understand your counterpart better and improve the quality of your deals.

Read More about The view from the other side of the table

Pagination

  • First page 1
  • Ellipsis …
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Current page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Ellipsis …
  • Last page 39

External CSS

Homepage Breadcrumb Block

Official Logo of Columbia Business School

Columbia University in the City of New York
665 West 130th Street, New York, NY 10027
Tel. 212-854-1100

Maps and Directions
    • Centers & Programs
    • Current Students
    • Corporate
    • Directory
    • Support Us
    • Recruiters & Partners
    • Faculty & Staff
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Accessibility
    • Privacy & Policy Statements
Back to Top Upward arrow
TOP

© Columbia University

  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Back to top

Accessibility Tools

English French German Italian Spanish Japanese Russian Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Traditional) Arabic Bengali